In recent years, the balance of power has shifted even further towards large multi-manager platforms. Their operating model; multi-PM pods, centralised risk oversight, and robust treasury and financing infrastructure; has consistently delivered strong, predictable performance, even in volatile markets.
A few themes underpin their continued dominance:
Large multi-manager firms emphasise lower volatility and disciplined portfolio construction. By carefully balancing risk, return, cost and capital usage across strategies, they create smoother return profiles that appeal to institutional allocators.
These firms tightly control the flow of capital to each PM or strategy, allocating based on live risk metrics, volatility forecasts, cost of capital, and historical performance. This internal market for capital means that PMs operate efficiently, as well as being incentivised to generate the highest risk-adjusted returns.
Scale brings efficiencies, including better prime brokerage terms, more favourable financing rates, and the ability to invest heavily in technology. This reduces friction, simplifies the allocation of capital, and supports dynamic leverage management.
These advantages mean the largest firms can:
However, while few firms can replicate the full scale or infrastructure of the top multi-managers, many of the underlying treasury principles can be adopted at any size.
For lean multi-manager setups, multi-strategy funds and single-manager firms, embedding these capabilities into daily workflows can meaningfully enhance performance and capital efficiency.
Treasury sits at the intersection of risk, financing, liquidity and portfolio management. When structured effectively, it enhances oversight, reduces costs and frees up capital. Below are the core pillars of an optimal treasury function, and how firms can adopt them, regardless of size.
Transparency into financing, margin and capital usage is the foundation of an efficient treasury function.
Many funds still rely solely on daily statements from their prime brokers. While these are essential, they don’t offer a complete picture, and can leave firms dependent on the assumptions, methodologies and pricing models of their financing counterparties.
By independently calculating margin, financing charges and capital consumption, firms can get:
This independence is a critical shift. Instead of reacting to PB statements, treasury teams can proactively manage leverage, financing and capital allocation using their own models and data.
With independent calculations comes better governance. Treasury teams can validate PB charges, dispute discrepancies early, and run a tighter, more controlled financing function. They gain a consolidated, real-time view of:
This visibility strengthens risk management and creates a more professional and accountable relationship with financing partners.
Even well-run hedge funds often inherit legacy financing structures; certain strategies placed with certain PBs simply because that’s how it has always been done.
This means funds maintain adequate liquidity buffers to withstand stress, meet collateral calls and continue operating without disruption.
Understanding capital usage at a granular level enables better internal capital allocation.
By attributing capital costs to individual PMs or strategies, treasury teams can incorporate these metrics into performance reviews and allocation decisions.
When volatility, returns and capital usage are assessed together, CIOs can:
This internal market for capital mirrors the model used by leading multi-manager platforms, and can significantly enhance investor outcomes even in smaller firms.
While most funds monitor market risk closely, fewer rigorously test how financing requirements may evolve under stress. Financing reacts differently under extreme conditions, and failing to plan for this can lead to costly liquidity squeezes.
By simulating worst-case market events, treasury teams can understand:
This means funds maintain adequate liquidity buffers to withstand stress, meet collateral calls and continue operating without disruption.
When these elements come together, treasury becomes far more than a control function. It becomes a profit centre.Key outcomes include:
Key outcomes include:
Ultimately, these improvements compound. Funds with disciplined treasury processes weather volatility better, allocate capital more intelligently and deliver more attractive, predictable returns.
Cassini provides Hedge Funds with margin and collateral analytics across the trade lifecycle covering various margin models and technology
Through independent, real-time calculations and actionable insights, Cassini helps firms to build a robust, efficient treasury function, without requiring the scale of a multi-billion-dollar multi-manager platform.
Our platform acts as the central hub for financing intelligence, giving CIOs, COOs, CROs and treasury teams the information they need to access leverage efficiently, control financing costs and enhance investor returns.
Whether you’re a multi-strategy fund looking to scale, a lean multi-manager platform seeking more control, or a single-manager fund aiming to improve returns by, Cassini provides the tools to strengthen your financing processes by reducing margin, managing capital efficiently and mitigating risk, creating a more resilient business.